Main findings
-
Growth prospects are better in emerging markets than in developed countries for some decades to come due to favourable demographics and healthier public finances.
-
The theoretical case for a positive relationship between economic growth and equity returns can be inferred from neoclassical growth theory.
-
Finance theory, in particular an international version of the Capital Asset Pricing Model, emphasises the role of a market’s covariance with the global portfolio, and not economic growth, as the main driver of expected returns.
-
Restricted capital mobility or market segmentation could explain deviations from the international CAPM. Political and governance risks are also potential factors in determining expected returns.
-
Empirical evidence in developed and emerging markets does not support the notion of a structural relationship between economic growth and equity returns. The two main reasons are: (a) some countries are better than others at converting GDP growth into profit growth, and (b) better growth prospects are often reflected in market prices.
Download the discussion note (PDF)