To reach the aim of highest possible return we need to identify, measure and manage the risks the fund faces. We do this using a variety of models and approaches.

The fund’s exposure to market risk is determined primarily by the composition of the benchmark index. Much of the risk in the fund is driven by how much of the fund is invested in equities and how much equity prices fluctuate. Movements in interest rates, credit premiums and exchange rates also play a role.

Limits for deviations from the benchmark index

The Ministry of Finance has set limits for how far the fund may deviate from the benchmark index. The most important limit is expressed using the statistical concept of expected relative volatility, or tracking error. The limit for expected relative volatility has been set at 125 basis points. This means that the difference between the return on the fund and the return on the benchmark portfolio is expected to be more than 1.25 percentage points in only one out of every three years.

Expected relative volatility is calculated using a statistical model which estimates future market volatility on the basis of historical price movements for the various securities held by the fund. The risks to which the fund is exposed are complex, however, and cannot be captured by any single measure. We therefore use multiple approaches and metrics to assess the risk in our management of the fund.

Stress testing

Stress tests aim to quantify potential losses in drastic scenarios in order to calculate the overall impact on the portfolio. The fund performs various types of stress test, covering both historical and hypothetical events. Historical stress testing takes changes in market factors such as equity prices, yields and real estate prices in past periods of stress and applies them to the current portfolio to gauge the effect of these events on the fund’s value. As part of this historical stress testing, we calculate expected shortfall, which measures the average loss for the portfolio in the most extreme situations, defined as the worst q percent of cases. Hypothetical, or predictive, stress testing combines subjective views with historical data to define shocks for a group of systematic risk factors for a given event. These risk factors are then applied to the current portfolio to calculate the impact on the fund.

Read the stress test report 2024

Concentration analysis

One of the simplest measures of risk in the equity portfolio is the degree of overlap with the benchmark index. This shows to what extent the equity portfolio is identical or equivalent to the benchmark index. A 100 percent overlap would mean that the equity portfolio is exactly the same as the benchmark index and has the same risk as the benchmark.

Factor exposure

Exposure to systematic risk factors such as small-cap stocks, value stocks and emerging markets normally brings higher returns, but also higher risks. It is therefore important to monitor the fund’s exposure to such factors continuously. We need both a static and a dynamic overview to manage systematic exposure to different risk factors.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is about our ability to rebalance the fund and make capital available to the fund’s owner in an efficient manner. Liquidity risk is followed up partly through requirements in the mandate for how much of the fund is to be invested in government bonds. Bonds from highly rated government issuers will normally be among the most liquid investments in the fund.

Risk measures

The risks to which the fund is exposed are complex, however, and cannot be captured by any single measure. We therefore use multiple approaches and metrics to assess the risk in our management of the fund:

  • Stress testing
  • Concentration analysis
  • Factor exposure
  • Liquidity risk

Key figures for the fund's risk and exposure

  Limits set by the Ministry of Finance 31.12.2024
Allocation Equity portfolio 60–80 percent of fund's market value1 71.4
  Unlisted real estate no more than 7 percent of the fund's market value 1.8
  Fixed-income portfolio 20–40 percent of fund's market value1 27.7
  Unlisted renewable energy infrastructure no more than 2 percent of the fund's market value 0.1
Market risk 1.25 percentage points expected relative volatility for the fund's investments 0.4
Credit risk Maximum 5 percent of fixed-income investments may be rated below BBB- 1.0
Emerging markets Maximum 5 percent of fixed-income investments may be in emerging markets 2.7
Ownership Maximum 10 percent of voting shares in a listed company in the equity portfolio2 9.6
1 Derivatives are represented with their underlying economic exposure.
2 Investments in listed and unlisted real estate companies are exempt from this restriction.

Risk and exposure for the equity and fixed-income investments

  Limits set by Norges Bank's Executive Board 31.12.2024
Credit risk Maximum 2 percent of the net asset value of the fixed-income investments may be invested in a single issuer government bond rated below BBB- 0.5
  Maximum 0.5 percent of the net asset value of the fixed-income investments may be invested in other single issuer rated below BBB- 0.1
Overlap between actual holdings and benchmark indices Equities minimum 60 percent 85.5

Risk and exposure of the fund’s unlisted real estate investments*

  Limits set by Norges Bank's Executive Board 31.12.2024
Country allocation US: 30–70 percent of the unlisted real estate investments 50.0
  UK: 10–40 percent of the unlisted real estate investments 20.1
  Germany: 0–20 percent of the unlisted real estate investments 5.0

Risk and exposure of the fund’s investments in unlisted renewable energy infrastructure

  Limits set by Norges Bank's Executive Board 31.12.2024
Direct investments in the construction phase Maximum 40 percent of unlisted infrastructure investments 0.6
Direct investments in the development phase Maximum 2 percent of unlisted infrastructure investments 0.0
Direct investments – share of business in renewable energy Minimum 80 percent of each investment 100.0

Approval of financial instruments, markets and issuers of government bonds

The Ministry of Finance’s Management Mandate for the Government Pension Fund Global requires Norges Bank to approve all financial instruments, markets and government bond issuers. Approval is to be based on an assessment of all relevant investment risks and operational risks.